"Primary" angles

Q&A and discussion on Secondary Progressions.
User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Primary" angles

Post by Arena » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:55 am

Ok, but do you know if the solar arc feature in astro.com would work for this?
I can see that my natal chart has 12,33 degrees between the DSC and the MC and when I cast a solar arc direction chart for today I see that this distance is 13,34 degrees and SA AC is partile conj. n. Mercury which is quite fitting for going back to Uni and maybe the business ventures as well.

PS. Oh wow, I've just been upgraded to be a "sidereal field agent" with over 500 posts (but was demoted from Irish by the move to the new site) ... should I take out my Bond wear and start a mission? :D
Last edited by Arena on Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Nabu
Posts: 4256
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: "Primary" angles

Post by Jim Eshelman » Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:01 pm

Arena wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:55 am
Ok, but do you know if the solar arc feature in astro.com would work for this?
I don't know. I've never used Astro.com to calculate charts. Others here probably do know.

The question is whether it is a feature to Solar Arcs per se, or is an option on how to calculate the progressed angles (probably listed as something like "by Solar Arc in longitude").
I can see that my natal chart has 12,33 degrees between the DSC and the MC and when I cast a solar arc direction chart for today I see that this distance is 13,34 degrees and SA AC is partile conj. n. Mercury which is quite fitting for going back to Uni and maybe the business ventures as well.
For your given birth time, your Solar Arc angles today are 6°56' Aquarius and 24°23' Cancer. Your (primary) progressed angles are 6°56' Aquarius and 4°06' Cancer.

Either way, MC is 12' shy (< three mounts) of moving into partile orb of square natal Neptune. Solar Arc Ascendant is in orb of square your natal Moon.

LOL, I picked "Sidereal Field Agent" as a pun on the astrophysical idea that the zodiac is a field. You are now one with the Sidereal Field. :)
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Primary" angles

Post by Arena » Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:08 pm

Yes astro.com shows AC at 24.23 Cancer, conj n. Mercury (and sq.n. Moon), which is why I said is quite fitting for me having gone back to Uni to study again.

But if you say by this method it would be 4,06 Cancer instead, well then it is sextile n. Pluto and quinc n. Jupiter and nowhere near to square the Moon which is at 25 Aries.

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Nabu
Posts: 4256
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: "Primary" angles

Post by Jim Eshelman » Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:28 pm

Arena wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:08 pm
But if you say by this method it would be 4,06 Cancer instead, well then it is sextile n. Pluto and quinc n. Jupiter and nowhere near to square the Moon which is at 25 Aries.
No, I said Solar Arc Ascendant was square your Moon, not progressed Ascendant, which is making no valid contacts.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

SteveS
Zodiac Member
Zodiac Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: "Primary" angles

Post by SteveS » Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:02 am

Recently, Arena asked if I had ‘proof’ that the birth “primary” progressed angles by Solar Arc are active no matter where we relocate away from birth location. Planetary pictures involving “primary” progresses angles are extremely rare in life (difficult to provide a group of statistical proof), but when they occur they will definitely manifest important life events. Jim has offered an important event in his life proving to him and me that we should not ignore the birth location PS-1 primary angles (Solar Arc in Longitude). Back on the old forum, I produced another classic example that the birth PS-1 angles should not be ignored pertaining to relocation, but I think it got lost in the move to new forum. I will post this example again in Jim’s thread on “Primary” angles.

https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Cooke,_Sam
Then at the peak of his career, Sam Cooke was tragically killed on 12/11/1964. Though details of the circumstances remain hazy; according to reports he was shot three times by the female manager of a Los Angeles motel who claimed she acted in self-defense. Cooke allegedly raped a 22-year-old woman and then turned to the manager. The death was ruled a justifiable homicide. However, it was rumored that many of the crucial details of the case were buried in deference to Cooke’s second wife and two children who wished no further publicity or scrutiny.
Sam (RIP) was tragically killed in LA on 12/11/64 app. 10:00 PM. Progressing his “Primary” progressed birth angles (PS-1) to his birth location produces the following chart. I think we are all in agreement that this birth location PS-1 calculated par-excellent angular planetary symbolism with Venus-Saturn-Pluto.

https://imgur.com/a/jOJ3y

Sam had been living in LA for years building his great musical career. Below is the same PS-I chart calculated for LA, his relocated residence away from his birth residence.

https://imgur.com/a/r2CU2

The par-excellent symbolism of angular Venus-Saturn-Pluto for this tragic event is not calculated for LA, Sam’s relocated residence from his birth location. Conclusion: When relocating to another re-located residence—do not ignore your PS-1 (Primary) progressed birth angles when there are (rarely)angular planetary pictures.

BTW, there was a partile t. Mars-Pluto cnj in the heavens partile 180 Sam’s Natal Moon at the time of this tragic event.

I will later post other examples of PS-I angles, one for a close business colleague with me understanding exactly what is happening in his immediate business environment.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest