"Planets on the Various Angles"?

General Discussion on Solar & Lunar Returns matters for which a specific forum does not exist
Post Reply
Joaquim Macedo
Meteorite Member
Meteorite Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 15, 2023 8:15 am
Gender:

"Planets on the Various Angles"?

Post by Joaquim Macedo » Tue May 30, 2023 3:00 am

Hi all!

I've bought "Interpreting Solar Returns", by James Eshelman, and I have the following doubt.
On second edition, page 56, Chaper 3 ( "Interpreting Planetary Angularity" ), he says:

"The capsule interpretations below are meant to be supplemental to the interpretations given previously, not to replace them. They were written to apply equally well to natal and solar planets."

Is it the same, for example:
natal Jupiter conjunct Lower Heaven on Solar Return
and
solar retunr Jupiter conjunct Lower Heaven on Solar Retrun?

Thanks a lot in advance!

Best Regards,
Joaquim.

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 18672
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Gender:

Re: "Planets on the Various Angles"?

Post by Jim Eshelman » Tue May 30, 2023 11:31 am

Joaquim Macedo wrote:
Tue May 30, 2023 3:00 am
I've bought "Interpreting Solar Returns", by James Eshelman, and I have the following doubt.
On second edition, page 56, Chaper 3 ( "Interpreting Planetary Angularity" ), he says:

"The capsule interpretations below are meant to be supplemental to the interpretations given previously, not to replace them. They were written to apply equally well to natal and solar planets."

Is it the same, for example:
natal Jupiter conjunct Lower Heaven on Solar Return
and
solar retunr Jupiter conjunct Lower Heaven on Solar Retrun?
Simple answer: yes.

Loner answer: The key is that these interpretations are meant to supplement the full angular planet interpretations, not replace them.

Therefore, natal Jupiter on IC starts with the "Natal Jupiter Foreground" interpretation:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=229#p1554
It then adds the ideas uniquely related to Jupiter on IC:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=205

In contrast, transiting Jupiter on IC starts with the "Transiting Jupiter Foreground" interpretation: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=227#p1540
and then adds the ideas uniquely related to Jupiter on IC.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 18672
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Gender:

Re: "Planets on the Various Angles"?

Post by Jim Eshelman » Tue May 30, 2023 11:31 am

Joaquim Macedo wrote:
Tue May 30, 2023 3:00 am
I've bought "Interpreting Solar Returns", by James Eshelman, and I have the following doubt.
On second edition, page 56, Chaper 3 ( "Interpreting Planetary Angularity" ), he says:

"The capsule interpretations below are meant to be supplemental to the interpretations given previously, not to replace them. They were written to apply equally well to natal and solar planets."

Is it the same, for example:
natal Jupiter conjunct Lower Heaven on Solar Return
and
solar retunr Jupiter conjunct Lower Heaven on Solar Retrun?
Simple answer: yes.

Loner answer: The key is that these interpretations are meant to supplement the full angular planet interpretations, not replace them.

Therefore, natal Jupiter on IC starts with the "Natal Jupiter Foreground" interpretation:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=229#p1554
It then adds the ideas uniquely related to Jupiter on IC:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=205

In contrast, transiting Jupiter on IC starts with the "Transiting Jupiter Foreground" interpretation: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=227#p1540
and then adds the ideas uniquely related to Jupiter on IC.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

Joaquim Macedo
Meteorite Member
Meteorite Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 15, 2023 8:15 am
Gender:

Re: "Planets on the Various Angles"?

Post by Joaquim Macedo » Fri Jun 02, 2023 2:08 am

Hi Jim!

Thanks a lot for the explanation!

Best Regards,
Joaquim.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests